jmatta33
New member
It's all ready to be picked up. (I think. Looked finished when I was there)
I can go pick it up and "test" drive it for you if you need me to.
I need to move to the west coast... lol
RLTW!!!
Coilover Question
- Thread starter jmatta33
- Start date
I need to move to the west coast... lol
RLTW!!!
thadeus618
New member
I was planning on going with the Rear DTD system also and would like to add the Genrite Tank but just from looking at the DTD setup it doesn't look like they will work together. Hopefully I'm wrong. Anyone know if you can do both?
ProfessionalDriver
New member
Planning to run a fuel cell where? In the cab? Or in the back under the body (Genright)?
It's my understanding that you can't run the Genright Fuel Cell Relocation kit with the EVO DTD. So if you're set on running that, your rear coilover options might be limited to EVO Bolt-On Coilovers or Genright.
jmatta33
New member
20 gallon fuel cell in the tub between the rear tires. it should fit if turned longways if i end up needing to cut into the cab
RLTW!!!
noroad
New member
Now thats some jeep porn, look at that under carrage lol :rock:
jmatta33
New member
noroad
New member
deff cleaner then a russian gymnist! lol
Metalcloak comes to mind
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
Let's see you prove it. Can you? You gonna tell us how wonderful the six packs are too?
I agree
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
You're the one that opened your trap, now prove me wrong newbie.
You made a statement, the metalcloak will give 14" of travel, been proved by plenty of people with it on, so prove it can't , you're the one who started with the attitude numpty, here is your proof
www.metalcloak.com
Now, fuckoff, get a better attitude next time someone points out that you made a false, stupid and uneducated statement ( even though all I did was point out another manufacturer ) .
Ya see fucktard YOU made the statement, I only answered you. I quite like the DTD, won't work with my setup, have to go bolt ons. Doesn't mean I have to put up with a shit eating keyboard hero like you though
Have a nice day
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
www.metalcloak.com
Now, fuckoff, get a better attitude next time someone points out that you made a false, stupid and uneducated statement ( even though all I did was point out another manufacturer ) .
Ya see fucktard YOU made the statement, I only answered you. I quite like the DTD, won't work with my setup, have to go bolt ons. Doesn't mean I have to put up with a shit eating keyboard hero like you though
Have a nice day
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
I think you're just here to run your mouth. One second you want to "try" to bash coilovers then the next you say they're sexy. You can't and won't back up your bashing simply because all the N/A's in your bio shows you don't have a clue what you're talking about, "Mate".
GCM 2
New member
Actually, Fox and King coilovers and bypass shocks have proven to be problem free. If they were not, these two companies combined would not own over 75% of the market in offroad racing. Go to any Ultra 4, LOORS, SCORE, or SST race series and look at what is attached to axles and trailing arms
....and by the way your quote in your signature is incorrect, it is by Yogi Berra and actually he is quoted as saying:
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is."
Didn't try and bash coil overs, you're the one claiming only king coilovers can do 14" travel, simply not true. What don't like others pointing out facts, and yes I have better things to do than fill in bio's
Although it goes to show, not all truck drivers are opinionated, mouthy fools, but all opinionated mouthy fools are truck drivers, good buddy
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
Although it goes to show, not all truck drivers are opinionated, mouthy fools, but all opinionated mouthy fools are truck drivers, good buddy
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
Metalcloaks WILL NOT give that kind of flex. There's a reason why you don't see many people on here running it. If you think a traditional coil spring lift will give that kind of flex (without unseating the springs) then you're smoking some pretty good dope.
You made a statement, the metalcloak will give 14" of travel, been proved by plenty of people with it on, so prove it can't , you're the one who started with the attitude numpty, here is your proof
www.metalcloak.com
Now, fuckoff, get a better attitude next time someone points out that you made a false, stupid and uneducated statement ( even though all I did was point out another manufacturer ) .
Ya see fucktard YOU made the statement, I only answered you. I quite like the DTD, won't work with my setup, have to go bolt ons. Doesn't mean I have to put up with a shit eating keyboard hero like you though
Have a nice day
The difference between theory and practice is.. In theory there is no difference.
Easy there hotshot. To be clear, the MC kit specifically states that their kit (with game changer shocks) offers up to 14 of "shock travel" - NOT "vertical travel". This is stated on their website and there is a difference between the two. From MC's website...
Another kit that comes to mind is the Rebel kit that comes with 14" Kings coil overs. However, when you do an actual measurement, it only yields about 9.5" of "vertical" travel in the rear and a bit more in up front. I have personally seen and measured this for myself. Likewise, an EVO lever only uses 8" coil overs but due to its design, yields 14" of vertical travel. Again, there is a BIG difference between "shock travel" and "vertical travel". The one who was stating "false, stupid and uneducated statement" here was you my friend and with a bad attitude. Just saying...