86 CJ7 with 92 YJ head and fuel injection?

S

snd00nz

New member
So I picked up an 86 CJ7 stretched and linked crawler with a 258ci engine that has been converted to the 92 YJ fuel injection setup. Looking at possible mods and/or upgrades and curious the compatibility or cross reference type items that work on both platforms. First maybe a header and low restriction exhaust system, are the headers the same from the stock year to the upgrade? I think they are different but not sure? Maybe any other suggestions for a strong and dependable setup?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
B

Blade

New member
If they did a full pulley swap and it is running a serpentine, everything for the 92 YJ should fit right on.
 
S

snd00nz

New member
So I guess that brings up another question. What all did they need to swap to make this conversion? What would have been the minimum? Is the head swapped or just intake and fuel system?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Last edited:
B

Blade

New member
snd00nz said:
So I guess that brings up another question. What all did they need to swap to make this conversion? What would have been the minimum? Is the head swapped or just intake and fuel system?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

I have seen Fuel injection conversions. It is more common than the full head swap. Can you post a picture of the top of the engine? That will give it away.
 
S

snd00nz

New member
Blade said:
I have seen Fuel injection conversions. It is more common than the full head swap. Can you post a picture of the top of the engine? That will give it away.
Click to expand...

I'll try and get a pic posted up tonight when I get home. I know it has the YJ computer and fuel system. Just not sure about the head.

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
bigcale

bigcale

Caught the Bug
Blade said:
I have seen Fuel injection conversions. It is more common than the full head swap. Can you post a picture of the top of the engine? That will give it away.
Click to expand...

+1 on the full head swap.

I did this on my 85 CJ7 with a head off of an 93 XJ. The swap needs the CPU the engine wiring harness and a few sensors. Mine used all the 4.2 accessories and not a serpentine. Although the swap was done in 99 and the details are somewhat fuzzy.

If I remember correctly I went with the full head swap because it flowed better than using the Mopar EFI swap that was just the intake, and it was cheaper.
 
S

snd00nz

New member
bigcale said:
+1 on the full head swap.

I did this on my 85 CJ7 with a head off of an 93 XJ. The swap needs the CPU the engine wiring harness and a few sensors. Mine used all the 4.2 accessories and not a serpentine. Although the swap was done in 99 and the details are somewhat fuzzy.

If I remember correctly I went with the full head swap because it flowed better than using the Mopar EFI swap that was just the intake, and it was cheaper.
Click to expand...

Cool, hopefully a pic tonight will help clear it up. Thx again for the help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
S

snd00nz

New member
Okay here's a pic. She's not the purdiest, but should get the point across. Lol. IMG_5290.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
S

snd00nz

New member
One more, are these engines solid or hydraulic lifters for the cam? Need to adjust the valve lash. Thx


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
S

snd00nz

New member
bigcale said:
+1 on the full head swap.

I did this on my 85 CJ7 with a head off of an 93 XJ. The swap needs the CPU the engine wiring harness and a few sensors. Mine used all the 4.2 accessories and not a serpentine. Although the swap was done in 99 and the details are somewhat fuzzy.

If I remember correctly I went with the full head swap because it flowed better than using the Mopar EFI swap that was just the intake, and it was cheaper.
Click to expand...

Got a pic posted. Any thoughts? Thx


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
bigcale

bigcale

Caught the Bug
snd00nz said:
Okay here's a pic. She's not the purdiest, but should get the point across. Lol. View attachment 243298


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

Tough to tell by the pic but it looks like a 4.0 head. The 4.2 came with a stamped valve cover not a cast one, although there were several aftermarket aluminium ones available.
CJ
984cbcea6c8daa3452505a802a708f8f.jpg
YJ
92_jeep_wranger_dv_13.jpg

I don't have any pics of my old CJ, what I had was lost a long time ago, the Jeep was sold in 2002.

As far as your original post, I would stay away from headers on the straight 6, they tend to crack. I seem to remember some of the 4.0s coming with a shorty header from the factory, not sure what Jeeps it was in though. If it is running a v belt then it is most likely CJ stuff on the front.

I would leave it alone unless you NEED more power. If I remember correctly the best options back then were a chip and a throttle body spacer, they would give decent gains and other than having to run premium gas they were reliable.
 
S

snd00nz

New member
bigcale said:
Tough to tell by the pic but it looks like a 4.0 head. The 4.2 came with a stamped valve cover not a cast one, although there were several aftermarket aluminium ones available.
CJ
View attachment 245426
YJ
View attachment 245427

I don't have any pics of my old CJ, what I had was lost a long time ago, the Jeep was sold in 2002.

As far as your original post, I would stay away from headers on the straight 6, they tend to crack. I seem to remember some of the 4.0s coming with a shorty header from the factory, not sure what Jeeps it was in though. If it is running a v belt then it is most likely CJ stuff on the front.

I would leave it alone unless you NEED more power. If I remember correctly the best options back then were a chip and a throttle body spacer, they would give decent gains and other than having to run premium gas they were reliable.
Click to expand...

Very good. Thank you. Any direction on chip? Not looking for huge gains just a little better for when on road not crawling.

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
bigcale

bigcale

Caught the Bug
snd00nz said:
Very good. Thank you. Any direction on chip? Not looking for huge gains just a little better for when on road not crawling.

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...


Jet makes one for the 92 YJ still. I think superchips used to, but I don't see it on their site, it might be worth asking them.
 
T_rav

T_rav

New member
I've been looking heavily into this swap. If it got the head then you need to go with a 4.0 exhaust manifold. The factory ones cracked so aftermarket is a better route to go. As far as head identification you can go bu casting number. I think 7120 and 0331 were a couple of the ones from that vintage. The number is above the #4 exhaust port cast into the metal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom