Sharkey
Word Ninja
Oh, I’ve read those threads. They are fun for sure.
Someone just tried to assassinate Trump
- Thread starter Ddays
- Start date
Ddays
Hooked
Perfect - it’s all in fun
Sharkey
Word Ninja
And exactly how much radiation would they have experienced passing through the belt? I’ve read it was about the same as a chest X-ray. I’ve had several of those and am still alive and kicking.
At some point in life you have to weigh the evidence presented and come to your own conclusions. I have not read a single debunking claim that I personally feel outweighs the substantial scientific evidence that the landing occurred. And I’ve never met two people that can effectively keep a secret for 50 years, much less literally thousands of people.
jeeeep
Hooked
Why didn't the Apollo astronauts die from radiation exposure?
If space is full of deadly radiation, how could astronauts survive there?
www.spacecentre.nz
Sharkey
Word Ninja
Bullshit! That can’t be true. It’s an impenetrable force field that will kill you instantly!
NPC 6060⁸42
Hooked
jeeeep
Hooked
Well, to be fair, every picture and map I've seen of the Earth, it's very flat
OverlanderJK
Resident Smartass
My question, yet we don’t have the technology to go there today. The government never lies to us. The radiation from the Van Allen belt is safe and effective.
OverlanderJK
Resident Smartass
Nothing to see here.
WJCO
Meme King
There's a couple of documentaries out there that go into even way more with other photos. Especially the ones where the camera crosshairs are behind objects when they should be in front of objects. It's pretty hard to look at that kind of evidence and put full trust in the official story.
Sharkey
Word Ninja
You still haven’t answered my question about the laser ranging panels and how they got there.
Who said we don’t have the technology to go?
Here are a few more things that support the landing.
1. Physical evidence returned to Earth
• 842 pounds of Moon rocks were brought back by Apollo missions.
• These rocks are chemically and isotopically distinct from Earth rocks and from meteorites.
• Scientists worldwide (including in countries adversarial to the U.S.) have studied them for decades and agree they are lunar in origin.
2. Independent verification by other countries
• The Soviet Union, which was competing with the U.S. in the Space Race, tracked Apollo missions in real time and never disputed the landings.
• Modern spacecraft from Japan, India, China, and Europe have photographed Apollo landing sites from orbit.
3. High-resolution images of the landing sites. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has imaged:
• Descent stages of lunar modules
• Astronaut footpaths
• Rover tracks
• Experiment packages left behind
• These images match mission logs exactly.
4. Consistent telemetry and radio tracking
• Apollo missions were tracked by multiple independent ground stations worldwide.
• Radio signals came from the Moon, with measurable signal delay and Doppler shift consistent with lunar distance.
5. Physics matches
• The motion of dust, shadows, and lighting in lunar footage matches vacuum and low-gravity physics, not studio effects.
• Alleged “inconsistencies” (waving flags, no stars, odd shadows) all have well-understood physical explanations.
Your position is literally that thousands of nongovernmental scientists, and thousands of governmental scientists from incredibly adverse nations, and hundreds of non-scientist workers, all collaborated to pull off the biggest live hoax of all time.
Ok…
Sharkey
Word Ninja
Right, because 2D photos of 3D situations never create a vanishing point for parallel lines or do weird things with shadows, especially with wide angle lenses.
Attachments
