Search results

  1. Sharkey

    Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

    Two things can be true at the same time. In my opinion, she is responsible for her own death because she intentionally put herself in harms way and intentionally interfered with an officer’s performance of his duties, then she disobeyed lawful direction, and then she attempted to flee and quite...
  2. Sharkey

    Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

    If he didn’t have a body cam then I think it was entirely appropriate to get film evidence (with his phone) of these fucktards interfering with his ability to perform his duties. And ya, as soon as she started driving at him, it was also appropriate to drop the fucking phone and reach for his...
  3. Sharkey

    Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

    Your “logic” is fun. Are you sure it isn’t the fault of the gun manufacturer? Or maybe if the ICE officer’s mother never had him, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.
  4. Sharkey

    Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

    Of the parties involved, which person had the ability to make sure that the interaction in its entirety never occurred? One person was where their job required them to be, the other person was there to interfere, by choice. Did she deserve to die? No. Is it her fault that she is dead…absolutely.
  5. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    Your math doesn’t math.
  6. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    Interesting. I run a piston on my pistol can but maybe that has to do with the higher caliber and gas.
  7. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    Won’t you still need a piston for the can because the barrel isn’t fixed?
  8. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    How do you like the Ruger/Marlin 45-70? That’s on my shortlist.
  9. Sharkey

    Random Internet Shit you've come across

    Idaho is becoming more conservative and it is because of the Californians moving here.
  10. Sharkey

    Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

    It’s the 5th, not the 4th (this isn’t a “search and seizure). While the government has eminent domain rights, there must be just compensation. But, those rights don’t include redistributing to the public and there are very few situations where a private right of domain exists (i.e. ditch...
  11. Sharkey

    Someone just tried to assassinate Trump

    Lawyers are going to have a field day with 5A claims if someone actually seizes real property.
  12. Sharkey

    Old School Cool

    Overlander’s “extensions”?
  13. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    No. It’s a sig threaded barrel.
  14. Sharkey

    Random Internet Shit you've come across

    Would you? Or would you say it was all AI generated? I guess only time will tell. One way or another, it will be fun to come back to this thread to see how it aged. By then we could all be driving electric Jeep JZ’s.
  15. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    The flux platform has a thumb safety built in. The trigger can’t move.
  16. Sharkey

    Show Off Your Guns!

    So this thing is insanely fun and crazy accurate for what it is. My boys were pinging a torso plate at 60 and 100 yards with no support.
  17. Sharkey

    Random Internet Shit you've come across

    What “proof” would it take for you to believe that the landing happened? If you were able to look through a telescope with your owns eyes and see footprints, or remnants of the mission, would you then believe that it happened? What happens when someone lands on the moon again in the next 30...
  18. Sharkey

    Rabbit Holes 🐇

    Right, because 2D photos of 3D situations never create a vanishing point for parallel lines or do weird things with shadows, especially with wide angle lenses.
  19. Sharkey

    Rabbit Holes 🐇

    You still haven’t answered my question about the laser ranging panels and how they got there. Who said we don’t have the technology to go? Here are a few more things that support the landing. 1. Physical evidence returned to Earth • 842 pounds of Moon rocks were brought back by...
  20. Sharkey

    Random Internet Shit you've come across

    I’d state it differently. The basic theme is that people believe what they want to believe based on the amount of “evidence” they find acceptable to reinforce the narrative that makes them feel good. Most of the time it only takes a question or two to uncover a person’s intellectual hypocrisies...
Top Bottom