I originally planned on trying to get a new JK but the stars have not aligned. I have had a tj with the 4.0 and it was a awesome jeep kinda wanted a jk but am a little concerned about the 3.8 engine. Only looking to spend about 15k I can get some really clean tj with 60k to 100k miles on them or there are a few jk with 70k to 130k on thim in my price range. Just wondering if the jk is worth the risk with the 3.8?
I have both and I think the 4.0 on the TJ is much better than the 3.8 in the JK.
However, my TJ has a manual transmission, my JK is automatic. JK is 4 door and of course the TJ is 2 door. With that said, power, torque, and overall performance are significantly better in my TJ. I like the JK but if I had to do it again I'd buy one with a manual transmission. I just got a sweet deal on it and couldn't pass it up.
What everyone has said about the 3.8 is right. It is underpowered and may require monitoring with regard to burning oil. But that type of monitoring should be applied to all vehicles to ensure their longevity. With proper gearing and calibrating for size and gears with a flashcal or procal, the 3.8 on the JK does not run bad. And correcting the terrible shift points on the 3.8 is huge (at least it was for me).
With your price range, like mentioned by Grubbicon, I'd look at the price for parts. I was used to the price range for TJ parts and when I got into JK parts I quickly saw how much more I'd be spending. Also, you can find some nice TJs with low miles in that range. Finding them isn't too hard in California (selling mine with 80k). It comes down to preference and compromise, what fits you best will be up to you.