All the options out there and you went with the one that has been proven to allow dirt into the motor. Lol
I suppose I haven't bought into the assumption that the air filter caused the failure. Nor do I think that any one of these systems is truly materially different than the other intakes. Maybe the intakes with a sealed box offer more insurance against water and a bit more insulation from engine heat, but that's about it. They are more or less a thermoplastic or mandrel bent metal tube with a hole for a temp sensor and an accommodation for a vacuum hose. The filter elements are near identical and If one filter is better than he other, order one to fit the diameter of the tube. Done.
If I bought into the assumption that the intake was the cause for engine failure, then we should all buy into any claims that lifts, gears etc could do the same. Perhaps that's just what Chrysler says. That's also the same company as voiding warranties for having lifted rigs. How do we know that the dirt in the engine wasn't caused by casting sand or some other factory/manufacturing issue? Now, maybe I'm wrong and in a few months all you can say "I told you so". If that's the case I'll have a really cool v6 to use as the coffee table base man cave. I just see so many other off-road race running K & N type filter elements. Was out with some buddies in buggies and raptors last weekend and each rig ran similar filter elements in very dusty environments. They don't have engines failing left and right. Nor are they discovering a bunch of sucked in crap in the intake when they maintenance their vehicles. I have had a K&N and filter on virtually every half of the vehicles I have owned without problems. If I'm wrong I'll have to live with it. I just don't think I am.
It's temp till the hemi swap. It's only money and now it looks cool.
Yes it's likely temp but I don't think it looks that cool. Was actually gonna peel the Mopar sticker off the tube and paint it black.