Random Internet Shit you've come across

Ddays said:
Well they teach them we landed on the moon and that 9-11 was caused by a bunch of sand people that couldn't fly for shit so 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
And then on Sundays, they teach them that Adam and Eve were the first two humans, that people have been around for only 6,000 or so years, and that some dude with a funny name was able to part an entire sea (all of which is far more believable than a moon landing). ;)
 
Sharkey said:
And then on Sundays, they teach them that Adam and Eve were the first two humans, that people have been around for only 6,000 or so years, and that some dude with a funny name was able to part an entire sea (all of which is far more believable than a moon landing). ;)
Click to expand...
We’re covering that here as well - c’mon Sharks - you’ve been missing some lessons here 😑

Or that the entire universe began from a pinhead of matter and expanded into all this in a microsecond.
Or that the Gov't told the truth about Covid
Or that all vaccines are safe and effective, even though not one has been clinically tested.
Or that the Pyraminds and monolithic structures around the world aren;t related
Or that the Pyramids are tombs built by modern for the day Egyptians 2500 BC

The basic theme is that most of human history we've been taught is bullshit and the government lies about everything
 
Last edited:
Ddays said:
We’re covering that here as well - c’mon Sharks - you’ve been missing some lessons here 😑

Or that the entire universe began from a pinhead of matter and expanded into all this in a microsecond.
Or that the Gov't told the truth about Covid
Or that all vaccines are safe and effective, even though not one has been clinically tested.
Or that the Pyraminds and monolithic structures around the world aren;t related
Or that the Pyramids are tombs built by modern for the day Egyptians 2500 BC

The basic theme is that most of human history we've been taught is bullshit and the government lies about everything
Click to expand...
I’d state it differently. The basic theme is that people believe what they want to believe based on the amount of “evidence” they find acceptable to reinforce the narrative that makes them feel good. Most of the time it only takes a question or two to uncover a person’s intellectual hypocrisies and confirmation biases.

Some people will always seek out a narrative that the government lies about everything.

Some people will always seek out a narrative based in religion.

Some people will always seek out a narrative based in “known” earthly science.
 
Sharkey said:
I’d state it differently. The basic theme is that people believe what they want to believe based on the amount of “evidence” they find acceptable to reinforce the narrative that makes them feel good. Most of the time it only takes a question or two to uncover a person’s intellectual hypocrisies and confirmation biases.

Some people will always seek out a narrative that the government lies about everything.

Some people will always seek out a narrative based in religion.

Some people will always seek out a narrative based in known earthly science.
Click to expand...

I’d agree with that. My main issue is with folks that aren’t willing to at least entertain the notion that there are alternative explanations that don’t fit the conventional narratives. In fact if you just listen and do some real digging some of said narratives are ridiculous
 
Sharkey said:
I’d state it differently. The basic theme is that people believe what they want to believe based on the amount of “evidence” they find acceptable to reinforce the narrative that makes them feel good. Most of the time it only takes a question or two to uncover a person’s intellectual hypocrisies and confirmation biases.

Some people will always seek out a narrative that the government doesn't lie.

Some people will always seek out a narrative based in religion.

Some people believe we landed on the moon.
Click to expand...
Yup
 
OverlanderJK said:
Yup
Click to expand...
What “proof” would it take for you to believe that the landing happened? If you were able to look through a telescope with your owns eyes and see footprints, or remnants of the mission, would you then believe that it happened?

What happens when someone lands on the moon again in the next 30 years and there are photos of the Apollo stuff? Will you believe it then, or just think everything is fakes?
 
Sharkey said:
What “proof” would it take for you to believe that the landing happened? If you were able to look through a telescope with your owns eyes and see footprints, or remnants of the mission, would you then believe that it happened?

What happens when someone lands on the moon again in the next 30 years and there are photos of the Apollo stuff? Will you believe it then, or just think everything is fakes?
Click to expand...
I would believe if we went back in the next 30 years and found evidence. Problem with that, we can’t get there and there would be no evidence.
 
OverlanderJK said:
I would believe if we went back in the next 30 years and found evidence. Problem with that, we can’t get there and there would be no evidence.
Click to expand...
Would you? Or would you say it was all AI generated? I guess only time will tell. One way or another, it will be fun to come back to this thread to see how it aged. By then we could all be driving electric Jeep JZ’s.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom