Account Delete

Sharkey

Word Ninja
It does matter, which is why GDRP was such a massive deal when it was voted on and approved.

EU citizens have that right on the internet, regardless of where the site is based. It effects all organizations worldwide that have EU citizens as users.

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk

There is quite a bit of funny right there.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 
It does matter, which is why GDRP was such a massive deal when it was voted on and approved.

EU citizens have that right on the internet, regardless of where the site is based. It effects all organizations worldwide that have EU citizens as users.

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk

No you really fucking don’t, you ain’t special snowflake. ‘Murica
IMG_6150.JPG


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 
Fuck of douche waffle. You have no idea what you are talking about. Get lost.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/Privacy/777680/GDPR-Enforcement

https://www.red-gate.com/simple-talk/sysadmin/data-protection-and-privacy/gdpr-in-the-usa/

I very much know what I'm talking about. If you want to discuss it like an adult, let me know. Otherwise, cut the chest beating, you're not intimidating anyone.

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk
View attachment 342704
 
Last edited:

JK_0311

Member
I’m not a lawyer but how can another country or series of counties, enact laws on US businesses or people or the US on others? I’m sure for US companies that want to do business in the EU, will comply. But I highly doubt this can or will be enforced on US companies.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 

Sharkey

Word Ninja
I very much know what I'm talking about. If you want to discuss it like an adult, let me know. Otherwise, cut the chest beating, you're not intimidating anyone.

Ok, let’s start here. What “private” information, information subject to this law, do you think is being collected and stored here?

After that, we can have a conversation about what types of websites are even subject to the law.

Then, we can have a long conversation about contractual choice of law and choice of forum.

If we make it that far, maybe we can finally get to a discussion of waiver.

I have no idea what I am talking about, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night.

Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 

Sharkey

Word Ninja
I’m not a lawyer but how can another country or series of counties, enact laws on US businesses or people or the US on others? I’m sure for US companies that want to do business in the EU, will comply. But I highly doubt this can or will be enforced on US companies.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE

Short answer, they can’t. They can enact laws that impact foreign businesses doing business in their country (which can include selling goods or services in their country via the Internet). Countries can also enter into treaties and other agreements whereby there is an agreement to enforce foreign legal concepts (by way of example, the US has tried, mostly unsuccessfully, to get many Asian countries to recognize and enforce US intellectual property law).


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 
Last edited:
I’m not a lawyer but how can another country or series of counties, enact laws on US businesses or people or the US on others? I’m sure for US companies that want to do business in the EU, will comply. But I highly doubt this can or will be enforced on US companies.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
The attachment I included is a very brief description of how it's enforced, and it's been enforced. Short version: reciprocal treaties between countries.

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk
 

JK_0311

Member
Short answer, they can’t. They can enact laws that that impact foreign businesses doing business in their country (which can include selling goods or services in their country via the Internet). Countries can also enter into treaties and other agreements whereby there is an agreement to enforce foreign legal concepts (by way of example, the US has tried, mostly unsuccessfully, to get many Asian countries to recognize and enforce US intellectual property law).


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE

Thanks for information, appreciate the insight.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 
Ok, let’s start here. What “private” information, information subject to this law, do you think is being collected and stored here?

After that, we can have a conversation about what types of websites are even subject to the law.

Then, we can have a long conversation about contractual choice of law and choice of forum.

If we make it that far, maybe we can finally get to a discussion of waiver.

I have no idea what I am talking about, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night.

Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
Anything that's personally identifiable, including IP addresses.

So, for a forum that would be the account, account profile and any history or log of connections.

If an EU citizens wants their PII removed, all logs and history would need to be purged to be compliant.

I don't think it would be applicable to thing such as normal posts, unless of course someone posted their name or email address or location in a post. Then that would be included as well.
Short answer, they can’t. They can enact laws that that impact foreign businesses doing business in their country (which can include selling goods or services in their country via the Internet). Countries can also enter into treaties and other agreements whereby there is an agreement to enforce foreign legal concepts (by way of example, the US has tried, mostly unsuccessfully, to get many Asian countries to recognize and enforce US intellectual property law).


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
It has been enforced already. It's pretty reckless to say "it can't", when it already has been enforced in non-EU countries.

Also,California is passing (passed CPP, which covers their citizens in a similar manner.)

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk
 
It’s funny when people think that they can enforce things in other territories. Some people may choose to comply, doesn’t mean it’s enforceable. Just as the Uk passed a law saying all smart phones have to use the same charging cord, it doesn’t apply here. The same as California has to label every product conceivable “this product contains materials that are known to the state of California to cause cancer.”

You have navigated to a privately owned website, you have agreed to the terms and conditions to make an account, doesn’t matter where you live or what their laws are there, it’s not enforceable upon someone else. And yes we also have consumer protection laws that is the reason every website now alerts you with a pop up that they use cookies. Not the same as someone mad their porn history isn’t getting wiped when they ask them bc of the “EU’s law”


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 

Sharkey

Word Ninja
It's pretty reckless to say "it can't", when it already has been enforced in non-EU countries.

No, you are the one who is being reckless. A foreign country cannot unilaterally pass a law to be applied on US soil. Like I said, there are treaties and other mechanisms through which the US can agree to reciprocal enforcement of certain laws or concepts. Absent that, however, foreign law does NOT apply on sovereign soil (that’s why it’s called sovereign soil!)

With respect to the GDPR, there are absolutely companies in the US that need to be concerned with its application (to the company’s operations overseas through direct enforcement and here in the US through treaty-based enforcement).

But, the fact that an IP Address, an account username, or a login history exists is only one piece of the equation (pretty much a low level piece at that).

The GDPR applies to the processing of “personal data of data subjects” controllers and processors who are in the EU, but also to “processing activities” related to: (1) offering goods or services; or (2) monitoring data subject behavior that takes places in the EU. It can also apply when the subject of the information lives in the EU.

However, this free online forum is neither a processor nor controller of the personal data (what very limited personal data there might even be). It’s not selling data to anyone, or even selling products to anyone in the EU.

Moreover, the process of signing up involves giving consent regarding the PRIVATE information. Can consent be revoked related to the storage of that PRIVATE information? Sure.

But that doesn’t mean that a screen name or post history has to be deleted. In case you didn’t notice, both are not PRIVATE information because the user put all of that information out there for everyone to see. You don’t get to make something PUBLIC by posting it and then unring the bell and claim it’s PRIVATE. Similarly, if you post up your name and address, it’s public.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 
Last edited:

WJCO

Meme King
I have just passed a law myself...right here, right now.. that Coronavirus cannot leave China. There, it's final. Everyone is now safe.

Fuck you, Coronavirus. Stay in China.
 

Sharkey

Word Ninja
I have just passed a law myself...right here, right now.. that Coronavirus cannot leave China. There, it's final. Everyone is now safe.

Fuck you, Coronavirus. Stay in China.

Lol! Thank you. Now can I find some hand sanitizer somewhere?

Seriously though, I’m blown away that people don’t get that when they post something up it becomes public and they cannot simply demand that it be removed.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
 
No, you are the one who is being reckless. A foreign country cannot unilaterally pass a law to be applied on US soil. Like I said, there are treaties and other mechanisms through which the US can agree to reciprocal enforcement of certain laws or concepts. Absent that, however, foreign law does NOT apply on sovereign soil (that’s why it’s called sovereign soil!)

With respect to the GDPR, there are absolutely companies in the US that need to be concerned with its application (to the company’s operations overseas through direct enforcement and here in the US through treaty-based enforcement).

But, the fact that an IP Address, an account username, or a login history exists is only one piece of the equation (pretty much a low level piece at that).

The GDPR applies to the processing of “personal data of data subjects” controllers and processors who are in the EU, but also to “processing activities” related to: (1) offering goods or services; or (2) monitoring data subject behavior that takes places in the EU. It can also apply when the subject of the information lives in the EU.

However, this free online forum is neither a processor nor controller of the personal data (what very limited personal data there might even be). It’s not selling data to anyone, or even selling products to anyone in the EU.

Moreover, the process of signing up involves giving consent regarding the PRIVATE information. Can consent be revoked related to the storage of that PRIVATE information? Sure.

But that doesn’t mean that a screen name or post history has to be deleted. In case you didn’t notice, both are not PRIVATE information because the user put all of that information out there for everyone to see. You don’t get to make something PUBLIC by posting it and then unring the bell and claim it’s PRIVATE. Similarly, if you post up your name and address, it’s public.


Sent from my iPhone using WAYALIFE
It's all recognizable as PII under GDPR.

The information doesn't have to be publically available, but what's stored on servers and in logs.

The EU did pass a law that protects THEIR citizens. If an organization has EU citizens as a customer or user, they have to be GDPR compliant, regardless of what country the organization is in.

If that organization's servers records an IP address used by an EU citizen, that citizen could ask for that information to be deleted and the organization would be required to do so under GDPR. US treaties with the EU mean that it would be enforced, and it HAS been enforced.

Many websites are simply disallowing EU citizens from joining, so they don't have to comply. It's a work around, but it works.

And as I replied to someone else, the US and about ten states are already looking into passing another similar law here.

Sent from my HD1925 using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom