Wowee, such hostility. It was not bitching about a $6 shipping charge. It was mentioning that shipping is the same for one shirt as it is two, yet both shirts are charged. So therefore, as the consumer, it would be just as expensive for me to order one shirt now and one shirt next week as it would be to order both at once. Whereas if I ordered them separate, it would cost Eddie an extra shipping fee, therefore ordering together would cost him less. Hence why my original question was whether the double charge was an error. Then I was attacked about "bitching" when it was actually just a question of simple math and economics...